[Tech Business] How Cloud
Computing Is Changing Management
by
Quentin Hardy
YAGI
STUDIO/GETTY IMAGES
Theories
and practices of management often spring from the opportunities created by new
technologies. Interchangeable parts spurred ideas about structuring assembly
lines and logistics. The complex calculations of the field known as Operations
Research were enabled by mainframe computing. Client-server technology begat
enterprise resource planning systems, and the consequent system-wide visibility
that was required for what we call business process management (BPM).
That
makes it imperative to start thinking about how management will be changed by
the most impactful information technology of our time: cloud computing. What
does it allow us to do differently, and how will that change the way we do
things in the future?
History
suggests that the main way information technology changes management is through
changes in how information is gathered: the large-scale analysis of Operations
Research reflected painstaking data collection around a few metrics, which were
transferred to punch cards. BPM reflected the interactions of different
stakeholders, from product creation through supply chain to final assembly.
How organizations are changing
With
cloud, information travels rapidly in both directions, across computing systems
that, with attributes like virtualization, scaling up or down to handle bigger
workloads, or automated security patching across thousands of machines, are far
more flexible. This will likely mean a more flexible work structure as well, in
the interest of products and services that ideally can be adjusted to
anticipate customer needs. Key to the new system are rapid data collection and
analysis, followed by over the air changes to product software.
Likely
outcomes of the move to cloud include changing how products are designed;
closer collaboration between the corporate IT department and other business
units, including sales, finance and forecasting; and more customer interaction,
even to a point of jointly developing products with their consumers. In
particular, new ways of writing and deploying software will encourage new types
of faster-acting organizational designs. And the best way to anticipate how
these changes will occur is to hear from companies already aggressively
implementing them.
“It’s
already changing organizations, by moving IT from a cost center to something
with a place at the table in a lot of different meetings,” said Chris Jackson,
head of cloud platforms at Pearson, a global learning company. If Pearson is
looking at, say, a new online learning course, Mr. Jackson is part of early
product design meetings, offering tips on what user interaction data should be
collected, how, and how often a course might be tweaked. A job like his used to
be concerned only with things that happened later in the process, like
launching and maintaining a piece of software.
Public
cloud computing, offered by companies like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft
Azure, and my employer, Google Cloud, is still viewed by many as a cheaper and
more efficient way for companies to store and process data. The cost may be
lower, but like traditional computers, it is still a cost.
Lower
costs have been reason enough for many companies to shut down their proprietary
data centers and consume computational power and attendant software as a series
of on-demand services. Others use cloud computing software in their own data
centers, as a means of increasing resources and working faster.
How it effects product design and
customer experience
As
cloud technology improves, however, it is becoming easier for companies to
create products and services within the cloud, or model new products or
marketing campaigns as cloud-based software prototypes. The cloud is also a
common repository for the collection and analysis of new data, and the place
where an increasing number of artificial intelligence operations, like image
and speech recognition, are conducted.
The
evidence is already there, as startups increasingly conceive of their goods and
services largely as software-centric entities, from which data is continually
derived. Changes and upgrades become part of a continuous process.
Organizational functions blur as processes become increasingly iterative.
The
ride-hailing company Uber has stressed the importance of its hybrid cloud model
to ensure not just constant uptime, but an indivisible relationship between
product development and deployment. Uber is able to model a virtual fleet of
taxis from private cars through a combination of mobile software, large-scale
data analysis, mapping, and social networking.
A
similar dynamic of redefined processes and constant iteration is happening with
industrial products. Oden Technologies is a New York-based startup that builds
sensor systems for factories, enabling continuous, precise monitoring of large
and complex processes.
One
recent project involved building a tablet-based system for carrying out complex
calculations in real-time. The product, which might normally take six months to
a year to create, was finished in 10 weeks, thanks to accelerated testing, and
direct communication with the customer about needs and specifications during
design and construction. In effect, over time the initial design and the
prototype incrementally became the product, with the customer participating in
its creation.
“The
relationship with the customers tightens,” said James Maidment, the team leader
of the project. “We deployed faster, we got new requirements directly, and we
iterated more quickly. In a way, we don’t have a final product, we have a
customer relationship involved with a product.”
What else needs to change?
The
constant relationship between management theory and applied technology
shouldn’t be too surprising. William Hewlett, a founding father of Silicon
Valley, famously said “you cannot manage what you cannot measure.” It seems to
logically follow that opposite also holds true – what and how you measure
something influences the way it is managed.
How
soon will cloud be as influential for management as the mainframe or
client-server computing? In a recent paper, Erik Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, and
Chad Syverson found that major technology improvements may lag productivity
gains for years, even decades. The most tantalizing reason why: An ecosystem of
other changes has to arise, along with new thinking about how the technology
should be used, in order for it to have full impact.
Brynjolfsson,
a professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, thinks software-based advances
like AI and cloud-style software will find a place faster than many of the
earlier advances. For one thing, lower costs mean they can be quickly adopted
by startups unencumbered by legacy costs and practices. And, unlike
hardware-based advances, the influence this time will be from software – in
particular, what happens when teams throughout the corporation build products
and services using what is termed cloud-native software.
“With
the cloud, we can replicate processes more quickly,” he said. “But you still
need three things to be updated before you fully take advantage: Organizational
innovation, trained human capital, and social institutions, like infrastructure
and regulation, that accommodate new technologies.” He added, “the biggest
issue now is that important new technologies are moving ahead, and people
aren’t thinking enough about the big implications.”
The shift to “cloud native”
organizations
The
way software is conceived of for cloud computing may turn out to be as
important as the physical infrastructure of cloud (which is millions of
computer servers dispersed around the globe, connected by high-speed fiber
optic lines.)
“Cloud
native” software approaches stresses ease of use and low-impact alteration of
components of any given software application. Massive applications are
subdivided into a series of “microservices” that can be tweaked with little
effect on a running piece of software.
Traditional
complex software often has a series of relationships, called dependencies, with
other lines of code, requiring big rewrites for even trivial changes. Think of
it as the way a plant’s roots can grow over a big area, and intermingle with
other roots. By orchestrating microservices into highly portable units, called
containers, the dependencies are potted.
That
means it is possible to deploy and manage an application globally, from a
single location, with relatively little hassle. Kubernetes, the most popular
open source software for orchestrating such container usage, was originally
developed inside Google to run the company’s many global applications, and
easily alter products and issue software fixes at the greatest possible scale.
Google
now runs about 2 billion containers a week on its in-house version of
Kubernetes. Open source Kubernetes is managed by the Cloud Native Computing
Foundation, which counts among its members Google Cloud, Microsoft, IBM,
Oracle, and Amazon.
Dan
Kohn, the foundation’s executive director, has predicted that eventually much
the world’s legacy software, worth about $100 trillion in net GDP, will be
ported into Kubernetes, for better servicing.
Blackrock,
the world’s largest asset manager, recently built and released an investor
research application using Kubernetes in 100 days, about the time it might
normally take simply to procure computer equipment, on the cloud software it
runs on its own computers. The team of 20 people represented technology,
infrastructure, production operations, development and information security
parts of the business.
Michael
Francis, who led the project, noted how Kubernetes encouraged collaboration. “I
saw junior developers working directly with senior managers, asking what they
were looking for,” he said. “The feedback is much more rapid.” In addition,
there is less fear about taking on a big project, since the thousands of
processes involved in a large software project can be transparently managed,
and issues resolved quickly.
Kubernetes
works well, in part, because it fits a larger ethos in cloud technology,
flexibility. The computer server virtualization in cloud enables more workloads
per machine, and sudden influxes of data can “burst” onto other machines, even
in remote locations. Data and work can also be apportioned in smaller units and
dispersed, either for security or to maximize resources. As customers of public
clouds typically rent computation instead of buying assets, IT spending moves
from a fixed capital commitment to a more flexible operating expense.
Pearson
uses Kubernetes to develop, deploy and manage new kinds of online learning
systems in developing markets like India and Mexico. About 10 products serve
several hundred thousand students a month, and products are designed to
fine-tuned all the time, as opposed to an older twice-yearly model.
“It
forces our internal teams to think about innovating faster,” said Mr. Jackson.
“Conservatively, we can have 10 times more release activity.” The software is
designed to watch interactions with students, seeking ways to ensure they’re
learning, and this also requires closer consultation among product people,
software developers, and IT executives like Mr. Jackson, who handle resource
allocation.
He
calls it “a redistribution of accountability” with the organization, “changing
the perception of what IT is, when it becomes a value enabler.” The new way of
deploying software, he said, also gives him visibility on where and how it is
consumed, providing information about future costs. That modifies his job from
solely capital expenditure to operating expense, and effectively a collaborator
on growth.
In
1967, still early days in the Information Technology revolution, John Culkin
had a brilliant insight. “We become what we behold,” he wrote. “We shape our
tools and then our tools shape us.” Five decades on, we have the benefit of
much IT history, and can think how we, and our organizations may be shaped by
new technology. As our systems and people gain in their capabilities to adapt
to changing markets, every aspect of a business will become more responsive.
Fixed
job roles, like software engineering or financial planning, may evolve towards
domain knowledge, which is shared in collaborative teams, brought together and
disassembled for some part of a product life cycle. Companies may partner more
deeply, taking advantage of each other’s comparative advantage to meet a new
market need. Managers will need to concentrate more than ever on skills such as
collaboration, empathy, learning, and novel rewards to create an organization
hopefully even more adaptive than the cloud computing IT tool it beholds.
Source:
Harvard Business Review
(https://hbr.org/2018/02/how-cloud-computing-is-changing-management)
※ The tax, accounting, or tech business information above is for your reference, and is not legally binding.
※ The tax, accounting, or tech business information above is for your reference, and is not legally binding.

댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기